Amen, Xtina, my bullshit detector is running 24/7. Especially in the presence of:
1. Republicans
2. Unthinking, Lazy Connoisseurship
3. People who use the word "chicks"
4. I-get-off-on-looking-at-myself-as-a-poet-walking-around-in-my-own-poem
5. Haiku-like imagery
6. Cloying lyricism, female or male ("just one of the ____s")
7. Social Darwinism
8. People who read things "straight up"
9. Hipsters (especially indie-rock hipsters)
10. Cynicism (see #s 1, 7, and 9)
I love watching my mind contradict itself as I'm trying to draw up categories. As if you were on this side of the line or that side of the line. There is no line, there's just "I'm in a grumpy mood today." Even Baudelaire realized the spleen would pass. Why am I telling you this, you are not even here. You-know-who said that.
Last night I drove through huge puddles of rain to interview a photographer out in Gloucester, and that was nice: the rain, the photographer, the images, the dark (see #s 2, 4, and 6).
Hi, Tim, what's wrong with haiku-like imagery. What does that mean to you? Isn't the swift, loving naming of some phenomenon? Doesn't it connect with the New American Poetry, especially Larry Eigner, who loved haiku?
Posted by: Stephen Baraban | April 15, 2004 at 10:25 PM
What is the purpose of taxonomy?
Posted by: Mark L. | April 16, 2004 at 03:22 PM
It depends on whether you're asking me or Stephen. If you're asking me, I'd rather we just go get a beer and talk about it sometime in person.
Posted by: Tim | April 16, 2004 at 07:25 PM
Same Q. here: what's wrong with Haiku-like imagery??
Posted by: Bibliogal | April 16, 2004 at 10:56 PM
Did anybody actually *read* my post? Maybe it's not clear what I was trying to say...shall I get out my poems with haiku-like imagery in them and show you?
Posted by: Tim | April 17, 2004 at 12:51 AM